Antichrist

2 out of 10

Gratuitous, over-the-top, up its own arse, pretentious, art-school bullshit that I'd expect from an immature, attention-seeking student, not a seasoned, successful film-maker. Is Lars von Trier like this all the time, I wonder? The film would like to think it's deep and challenging, but... it's just not. Visceral maybe, but also quite missable. Oh, and it's got a close-up slow-mo of Willem Dafoe's erect penis and swinging balls in it too — you have been warned.

That aside, some of the scenes were quite beautifully shot. Some of the acting in the earlier parts of the film was pretty good too. Pity it was all wasted in this nonsense of a film.

Comments

Lindsay said…
Can a sack be any more shriveled than it typically is. If so, it will be Dafoe that proves it.

Popular posts from this blog

Downfall

The Brothers Grimm